Good question, Tria. Relevance and Relevant are essentially the same thing, just different parts of speech for a particular quality. They both mean “related to the matter at hand” or “pertinent.” For an essay, or any persuasive material, I mean to convey to you that a thesis should be “relevant” to both its intended audience, and to the actual material itself. In other words, a persuasive argument about why your roommate is a jerk is not relevant to an audience of coffee shop owners. And a thesis “my roommate is a jerk” is not relevant to a paper about coffee shops if you barely mention your roommate in the paper, or don’t actually provide evidence in the paper that your roommate is a jerk.
This entry was posted on September 29, 2009 at 1:35 am and is filed under Uncategorized.You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Question: What is the difference between revelant and relevant? Or is that just a spelling error up there?
Tria Vue said this on October 7, 2009 at 5:05 am |
Good question, Tria. Relevance and Relevant are essentially the same thing, just different parts of speech for a particular quality. They both mean “related to the matter at hand” or “pertinent.” For an essay, or any persuasive material, I mean to convey to you that a thesis should be “relevant” to both its intended audience, and to the actual material itself. In other words, a persuasive argument about why your roommate is a jerk is not relevant to an audience of coffee shop owners. And a thesis “my roommate is a jerk” is not relevant to a paper about coffee shops if you barely mention your roommate in the paper, or don’t actually provide evidence in the paper that your roommate is a jerk.
Make sense? Great question. —Steph
ashstephanie said this on October 7, 2009 at 1:10 pm |